News

Our latest news

Happy Holidays from the Matthews Law team

As always, we thank our clients and colleagues both in New Zealand and across the globe for your support. We wish you and your friends and family a relaxing and joyful holiday season and look forward to reconnecting in the new year.

This has been an exciting year for us, with partner Alicia Murray and solicitors Michael, Mariam and Emma joining us. We were privileged to work on many of the most interesting transactions and matters in the New Zealand competition space and look forward to another positive year in 2026.

Further, Matthews Law is delighted that it has been recognised as an “Elite” category firm in the GCR 100 2025 alongside colleagues at Russell McVeagh, Bell Gully & Chapman Tripp. We were also named “Antitrust Law Firm of the Year in New Zealand – 2025” in the 2025 Corporate INTL Global Awards.

This reflects the great clients we are privileged to support and the focus of our team (past & present) on the best strategy & outcomes for our clients. Thank you again for your support.

Matthews Law recognised in “Elite” Category in GCR 100 2025 Awards

We are delighted to announce that we have been recognised by Global Competition Review (GCR) in the GCR 100 2025 Awards as “Elite” (the highest category of recognition). These awards recognise the “world’s best competition practices”.

Our success reflects the great clients we are privileged to support and the focus of our team (past and present) on the best strategy and outcomes for our clients.

You can read more from GCR on this here: GCR 100 – Global Competition Review

Does competition law need to change?

Today, the Government announced two major reviews – one of the Commerce Act 1986, and another of the Commerce Commission’s governance settings.

Also today, the Commerce Commission shared its updated enforcement priorities, which outline the key areas it will be focusing its enforcement activity on.

Newsletter (October 2024)

There have been a number of key developments in the competition and regulatory spaces, which will impact many New Zealand businesses.

These are discussed in our October 2024 Newsletter below:

Matthews Law contributes NZ Chapter of Global Legal Insights (GLI) Merger Control 2024

We recently contributed the New Zealand chapter of Global Legal Insights’ “Merger Control 2024”. Our chapter discusses:

  • Merger control activity and statistics in the last 12 months.
  • Updates in merger control procedures, including updates to the Mergers and Acquisition Guidelines (in 2022) and the Authorisation Guidelines (in 2023).
  • Key policy developments, including an increased focus on the interaction between competition law and sustainability.
Newsletter (July 2024) – Celebrating 11 Years of Matthews Law

On the 10th of April we celebrated 11 years of Matthews Law whilst attending the American Bar Association Antitrust Spring Meeting in Washington DC.

To mark the occasion, we’ve come up with a brand-new newsletter that shares our new team, recaps key competition and consumer law developments, and celebrates our highlights and recognition.

New Zealand Commerce Commission files first-ever criminal cartel prosecution

In New Zealand’s first-ever criminal prosecution for cartel conduct, the New Zealand Commerce Commission (NZCC) has filed criminal charges against two construction companies and two directors for alleged bid rigging of publicly funded construction contracts. Andy Matthews comments:

The first New Zealand criminal cartel prosecution is a big deal. These proceedings will help clarify the role of criminal jurisdiction in the Commerce Act and are a timely reminder for people that any competitor interaction carries civil and criminal legal risk.

Competition law in the NZ Grocery Industry – Matthews Law Update & Guides

The recently announced proposed merger of Foodstuffs North Island and Foodstuffs South Island has gained much press. Some argue it will change little, given that the cooperatives work closely, have common branding, and have chosen (or agreed) to operate in separate geographic markets. The proposal has been promoted as leading to greater consolidation of efficiencies.

Legalwise IP Licensing Fundamentals webinar – Competition Law Reforms in New Zealand & Australia: Changes, Issues & Options for IP lawyers

Andy Matthews had the pleasure of speaking at the Legalwise IP Licensing Fundamentals webinar on 9 November 2023, presenting on Competition Law Reforms in New Zealand & Australia: Changes, Issues & Options for IP lawyers.

A copy of the slides and paper accompanying Andy’s session can be found here:

Click here to download the paper and slides accompanying Andy’s session

 

2023 36th IPSANZ annual conference: The interplay between patent law and competition law

Andy Matthews really enjoyed being part of the 2023 36th IPSANZ annual conference as a speaker on The interplay between patent law and competition law with Cynthia Cochrane SC (Level 22 Chambers, Sydney), Kon Stellios (Special Counsel, Specialist Advice and Services Division, ACCC, Sydney), Linda Govenlock (Partner, Allens, Sydney), and with Natalie Shoolman (Principal, Wrays, Sydney) chairing the session.

Click here to download an updated set of Andy’s powerpoint slides for the session
New misuse of market power law now in force in New Zealand (& 10 years of Matthews Law)

On 5 April 2023 the Commerce Amendment Act 2022 comes into full force. Significantly this means:

  • New Zealand’s misuse of market power provision now uses an “effects test”. Persons with substantial market power (SMP) are prohibited from engaging in conduct that has the purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition in the market they have SMP in, or any other market they directly or indirectly supply or acquire goods or services. The New Zealand Commerce Commission (NZCC) has published Misuse of Market Power Guidelines which set out how it intends to approach the new law. This is significant new “soft law”.
  • Intellectual property (IP) exceptions in the Commerce Act are now repealed. IP rights will now be subject to the same competition tests as any other property right. There will however be a 1-year transitional period for existing agreements which had relied on the IP exception for agreements. The NZCC has published draft guidelines on the application of competition law to intellectual property rights.
  • Cartel conduct now extends to land covenants, in addition to contracts, arrangements and understandings. There will however be a 1-year transitional period for covenants given before the commencement date.

10 things to know about the new law on misuse of (substantial) market power:

Residential building supplies market study final report released

The New Zealand Commerce Commission (NZCC) released its residential building supplies market study final report (Report) on 6 December 2022. The Report largely reinforces the findings and recommendations in the draft report with the benefit of further consultation and evidence.

Unchanged from the draft report, the Report’s key finding is that “competition for the supply of key building supplies is not working as well as it could if it was easier for building products to be introduced and for competing suppliers to expand their businesses”.

GREAT NEWS FOR MATTHEWS LAW – promotions, awards, scholarships, & safe travels. Plus the ICN cartels conference in NZ!

We are delighted to announce a series of exciting achievements for our staff.

  • We are proud that Andrew (Andy) Matthews has been named as one of Who’s Who Legal “Thought Leaders – Competition 2023”. We also congratulate the other two named individuals – our friends and colleagues barrister Sarah Keene and economist James Mellsop.
  • We welcome Charlie Matthews to the Matthews Law team and wish him the best in his exchange to National Cheng Kung University in Tainan, Taiwan.
  • We congratulate Danny Xie on her promotion to Associate.

Finally we are excited that we will see many colleagues in person at the International Competition Network next week.  The New Zealand Commerce Commission (Te Komihana Tauhokohoko) hosts the 2022 ICN Cartel Workshop in Auckland, 5- 8 December 2022. Nau mai, haere mai ki Aotearoa (Welcome to New Zealand).

NZCC consulting on draft Misuse of Market Power Guidelines – how will it approach anti-competitive unilateral conduct

The New Zealand Commerce Commission (NZCC) is consulting on new draft Misuse of Market Power Guidelines (Draft Guidelines). Submissions are due by 18 November 2022.

Purpose of and background to the Draft Guidelines

The Draft Guidelines explain how the NZCC proposes to assess conduct under the new test for misuse of market power which will come into effect on 5 April 2023. This is an opportunity to influence that approach.

Fair Trading Act changes take force targeted at unfair commercial practices

Changes to the New Zealand Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA) take force on 16 August 2022 which:

  • Prohibit unconscionable conduct
  • Extend the unfair contract terms regime to small trade contracts
  • Entitle consumers to direct uninvited direct sellers to leave or not enter their property

These changes are aimed at reducing the prevalence of unfair commercial practices across the economy. The Commerce Commission has also published guidance about each of these changes.

Residential building supplies market study draft report released

The New Zealand Commerce Commission (NZCC) released its draft report on its residential building supplies market study (Draft Report) on 4 August 2022.

The NZCC’s preliminary view is that “competition for the supply and acquisition of key building supplies is not working as well as it could if it was easier for building products to be introduced and for competing suppliers to expand their businesses.” The Draft Report identifies two main factors for this: (1) the regulatory system and (2) quantity-forcing rebates.

Ministerial taskforce to investigate plasterboard shortage while NZCC conducts building products market inquiry

Key takeaways:

  • In 2014 the New Zealand Commerce Commission (NZCC) did not find breaches of the Commerce Act by Winstone Wallboards, New Zealand’s only plasterboard manufacturer.
  • The NZCC is currently considering the plasterboard sector in its market study into residential building supplies.
  • The Government has now also set up a taskforce to investigate plasterboard shortages. This announcement shows urgency.
  • New Zealand’s monopolisation test will change from 5 April 2023.
Preparing for New Zealand’s new anticompetitive unilateral conduct regime

New Zealand’s test for anticompetitive unilateral conduct will change from 5 April 2023. Persons with substantial market power will be prohibited from engaging in conduct that has the purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition in a relevant market. The NZCC is expected to publish guidelines on the application of the new law.

In the meantime, we can look to Australia for guidance. Our new test follows earlier law reform in Australia which enacted the same change.

International competition law developments and what they mean for you

Competition law developments overseas can influence domestic thinking and trends. Two noteworthy recent international competition law developments are:

  • The EC’s new vertical agreement exemptions and guidelines – What lessons can we take in applying NZ competition law to vertical agreements?
  • The new chair of the ACCC’s speech on international collaboration of competition regulators – To what extent does the NZCC share the ACCC’s challenges and enforcement priorities?
New Zealand Government response to grocery market study: Be prepared for regulation

The New Zealand Government has announced its full response to the New Zealand Commerce Commission’s (NZCC) market study into the retail grocery sector which found competition is not working well for consumers and supermarkets earn NZ$1M a day in excess profits. The Government has accepted 12 of the NZCC’s 14 recommendations – and the 2 recommendations it disagrees with is because the Government plans to go further including developing an additional mandatory wholesale grocery access regime as a backstop for the voluntary regime recommended by the NZCC.

Happy Birthday to Matthews Law

On 1st April 2022 Matthews Law celebrates its birthday and the start of its 10th year in business as New Zealand’s leading specialist competition law firm.

Thank you to all our clients and colleagues for your continued support.

Commerce Amendment Bill passes third reading – NZ monopolisation law and merger control penalties will be changed

On 30 March 2022 the Commerce Amendment Bill (Bill) passed its third reading and should receive royal assent soon.

The Bill will:

  • replace the test for misuse of market power
  • extend the prohibition on cartel conduct to cartel provisions in covenants
  • remove intellectual property exceptions
  • empower the New Zealand Commerce Commission (NZCC) to grant interim authorisations for restrictive trade practices
  • increase maximum pecuniary penalties for breach of merger control laws
  • expand the NZCC’s (domestic) information sharing powers
New Zealand grocery market study final report released

On 8 March 2022 the New Zealand Commerce Commission (NZCC) released its final report on its study on competition in the retail grocery sector. The final report is the product of over a year of work after the NZCC was directed to look at factors affecting competition in the retail grocery sector on 17 November 2020.

Dynamic year for NZ competition law: highlights & takeaways

It’s been another dynamic year for New Zealand competition law, with the collaborative activity clearance and restrictive trade practices (RTP) provisional authorisation mechanisms introduced in recent years starting to see use and other proposals for change still on the horizon. Market studies have also seen a lot of activity, as has the Commission Commission’s (NZCC’s) case register.

On the consumer law side, the Fair Trading Amendment Act was enacted and the Government decided to implement a new legislative framework for a New Zealand consumer data right.

NZCC v Bunnings – Lowest prices guaranteed!

Key takeaways:

  • Good evidence is needed to successfully prosecute a criminal charge. Survey evidence of consumers’ understanding of claims is useful, especially if there are no consumer complaints or objective evidence that proves the claim is misleading.
  • Businesses cannot rely on literal interpretations of claims they make. They should consider what message the consumer would derive from the claim.
  • It is important to have good systems in place to support comparative price representations, especially now with the prohibition against unsubstantiated representations in force.

On 3 September 2021 the District Court dismissed 45 charges the New Zealand Commerce Commission (NZCC) filed against Bunnings Limited (Bunnings) for alleged breach of the Fair Trading Act 1986 (FTA).

Fair Trading Amendment Bill passes third reading – more competition law reform to come?

The Fair Trading Amendment Bill (Bill) had its third reading yesterday (10 August 2021) and should receive royal assent soon.  The Bill was introduced on 17 December 2019. (Changes proposed earlier are summarised here.)

[Update (at 19 August 2021): The Bill received royal asset on 16 August 2021. The main changes will come into effect on 16 August 2022 (to give businesses a year to review their practices and standard form small trade contracts and be ready to comply), but some provisions were effective from 17 August 2021. The Commerce Commission has usefully summarised this here.]

The Bill is one of many recent, current and potential competition law reforms by the government. They remind us that more changes could be implemented relatively quickly.

To share your data or not: NZ consumers to decide

Background

Last year, the NZ Government consulted the public on the options to establish a consumer data right (CDR) in NZ. (Our newsletter on the CDR consultation is here.) In this digital, data-driven world it is common for businesses to collect data from their transactions with consumers. (They can even end up with more data on a consumer than the consumer themselves!) A CDR will require certain businesses to share that data when requested to by the consumer. For example if someone wants to move banks, their old bank would be required to share necessary details with the new bank in a prescribed, secure manner and environment. The aim of a CDR is to ultimately enhance consumers’ welfare by reducing search and switch costs, facilitating competition and encouraging innovation.

Cartel conduct criminalised from today

The Commerce (Criminalisation of Cartels) Amendment Act comes into force in New Zealand today. This means that:

  • It is a now a criminal offence under the Commerce Act to enter into or give effect to a cartel provision while intending to engage in “price fixing”, “restricting output” or “market allocating”.
    • Cartel law is designed to prevent business rivals from colluding and agreeing not to compete with each other, for example agreeing not to undercut one another’s prices.
    • The cartel prohibition is drafted broadly and so all agreements between potential competitors should be carefully considered.
Hindsight is 2020: year end recap and what’s on the horizon

2020: Competition & consumer laws box on in the face of pandemic

Competition

Price fixing…

– comes in all shapes and sizes, and does not discriminate!

– comes with a hefty price tag, even for individuals!

New Privacy Act 2020

The new Privacy Act 2020 (Act) came into force on 1 December 2020, replacing the 27 year old Privacy Act 1993. The new Act is intended to be more fit for the digital age where new technologies, such as social media platforms, e-commerce, and cloud storage, have transformed the way personal information is used. Many of the reforms attempt to better align New Zealand privacy law with the GDPR.

NZ set to overhaul monopolisation law and increase merger control penalties

The New Zealand Government has announced its decision to make further major changes to NZ’s competition (antitrust) law. Assuming it is re-elected in September’s General Election, the Government anticipates introducing a Bill in early 2021 that would:

  • replace the test for abuse of market power;
  • remove IP exceptions;
  • increase pecuniary penalties for breach of merger control laws (making them consistent with the penalties for anticompetitive conduct);
  • expand the Commerce Commission’s (domestic) information sharing powers; and
  • increase the number of Commissioners from 6 to 8.
NZ’s top court rules in favour of Commerce Commission in first defended price fixing case in a decade

In its 2 April 2020 judgment, the Supreme Court ruled that an arrangement between Hamilton real estate agencies to adopt a vendor-funded model for listing properties on Trade Me (a major property listing website) and to remove existing listings from Trade Me in January 2014 had the effect of controlling the price of real estate services they supplied in competition with each other, amounting to price fixing in breach of the Commerce Act 1986 (Act).

Price gouging – illegal, or just morally wrong?

The issue of “price gouging” is very topical – not just in New Zealand, but globally – as governments are effectively forced to reduce the competitive playing field in response to COVID-19.

The New Zealand Government is acutely aware of the risk that essential businesses (eg supermarkets) might seek to take advantage of these unusual trading conditions. In an attempt to combat that risk, the Government has established a “whistle-blower” email address (pricewatch@mbie.govt.nz) for people to report allegations of price gouging. That email address attracted almost 1,000 complaints in its first couple of days and, if media reports are to be believed, it would appear there is a common sentiment among New Zealanders that they are feeling “ripped off”.

But complaints aside, is “price gouging” illegal in New Zealand, or is it just morally wrong?

123
Newsletter sign up

Sign up to our periodic newsletter and keep up with competition matters.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
×